Root Canal Treatment VS Implant

This issue is controversial to say the least, and often  spark  animated debates in the dental community. Therefore generates a lot of  confusion among patients, who often are told a totally different story visiting different dentists.

So what is the best solution?
It depends on the case and on several other factors:

FINANCIAL COST :  generally RCT and a crown is cheaper than an implant and a crown. In my practice about half the cost.
SUCCESS RATE :  RCTs and Implants, when executed by skilled hands, and in absence of anatomical complications, have both more than 90% of success. This statistics drops significantly if there are technical difficulties, such as severe root curvature, calcified canals, failed pre-existing Root Filling et for RCTs, mostly lack of bone, to be compensated with unpredictable and expensive bone graft procedure, for Implants.
LONG TERM SURVIVAL :  I agree that Implants, when they do not fail during the initial integration period, have a much longer life, due to the simple fact that, being done of metal, do not get decay.
TIME INVESTMENT :  As an average RCT requires a couple of visit, to be followed by another couple of appointments for the crown restoration. They can be booked at weekly intervals. Implants, if risky protocols such as post-extractive placement or immediate loading are avoided, require an extraction, an healing time of a couple of moths, the implant placement, another healing break of 2/3 months, and finally the crown restoration.

You should have a frank discussion with your dentist regarding pros and cons of the two options when it comes to decide what best suits you.

That is why I offer a 15 mins FREE CONSULTATION, no strings attached, to assess if Root Canal Treatment is the right course of action for my patients.

If you find this article informative, please feel free to share using the social media buttons at the bottom of the page.